CourtListener 10375514•In Re Matthew Flowers, Relator v. the State of Texas
In Re Matthew Flowers, Relator v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10375514Txctapp78 apr 2025
Testo completo
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00114-CR
IN RE MATTHEW LEE FLOWERS, RELATOR
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
April 8, 2025
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Relator, Matthew Lee Flowers, seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court directing
the “District Clerk Chrissy Dunn” to “forward relators [sic] Article 11.07 to the Court of
Criminal Appeals . . . .” We deny the petition.
We may only issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court
and as necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 22.221(a),
(b). We lack authority to issue one against a district clerk unless such is necessary to
enforce our jurisdiction. In re Kotara, No. 07-22-00092-CR, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 2818,
at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo April 27, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Nothing in
relator’s petition illustrates a need to issue a writ of mandamus against “District Clerk
Chrissy Dunn” to enforce the jurisdiction of this Court over any particular matter pending
before this Court. Indeed, it appears that he seeks our assistance in perfecting a matter
within the potential jurisdiction of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Thus, we dismiss
the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.