In Re: Jerald Mathew Cartee v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10295691Txctapp512 dic 2024

Testo completo

DENIED and Opinion Filed December 12, 2024

In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-01439-CR

IN RE JERALD MATHEW CARTEE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 380-83836-2019

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Reichek, Goldstein, and Kennedy
Opinion by Justice Kennedy
Before the Court is relator Jerald Mathew Cartee’s petition for writ of

mandamus, filed December 9, 2024. Relator seeks an order compelling the Collin

County District Clerk to file relator’s motion styled “Defendant’s Motion for

Reproduction of Documents.”

The petition does not comply with the requirements of Rules of Appellate

Procedure 52.3 and 52.7. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. “Because relator has failed

to comply with the requirements of rule 52, he has failed to show he is entitled to

mandamus relief.” In re Mendez¸523 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2016,

orig. proceeding). Moreover, this Court cannot issue a writ of mandamus against
the Collin County District Clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Potts, 357 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that

granting the petition is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/Nancy E. Kennedy/
241439f.u05 NANCY KENNEDY
Do Not Publish JUSTICE
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

–2–

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.