In Re Clarence McFarlin Jr. v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10776530Txctapp414 gen 2026

Testo completo

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00655-CR

IN RE Clarence MCFARLIN Jr.

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 14, 2026

PETITION FOR MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC DENIED

On October 13, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged

the legitimacy of a competency jury trial scheduled for October 15, 2025. We issued an order

denying the petition on October 14, 2025, and our opinion followed shortly thereafter. On October

28, 2025, relator filed a motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. This court has considered the

motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc and determined that relator is not entitled to the relief

requested. The motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC-2024-CR-6185, styled The State of Texas v. Clarence McFarlin Jr.,
pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Del Prado presiding.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.