In re Grand Jury

P R E L I M I N A R Y P R I N T
Volume 598 U. S. Part 1
Pages 15–16
OFFICIAL REPORTS
OF
T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T
January 23, 2023
REBECCA A. WOMELDORF
reporter of decisions
Page Proof Pending Publication
N O T I C E : This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before
the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter
of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543,
pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.

OCTOBER
TERM, 2022
15
Per Curiam
IN RE GRAND JURY
certiorari
to the united states court of appeals for
the ninth circuit
No. 21–1397. Argued January 9, 2023—Decided January 23, 2023
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 23 F. 4th 1088.
Daniel B. Levin argued the cause for petitioner. With
him on the brief were Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., J. Max Rosen,
Rachel G. Miller-Ziegler, and Evan J. Davis.
Masha G. Hansford argued the cause for the United
States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Prelo-
gar, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hubbert, Deputy
Solicitor General Feigin, S. Robert Lyons, Joseph B. Syver-
son, and Mark S. Determan.*
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently
granted.
It is so ordered.
*Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were fled for the American Bar
Association by Deborah Enix-Ross and John M. Colvin; for the American
College of Tax Counsel by Hashim M. Mooppan, Kathryn Keneally, Kelly
C. Holt, and Lawrence Hill; for the Buckeye Institute by Mark D. Harris
and Robert Alt; for the California Lawyers Association by Laura L. Buck-
ley and Adria Price; for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States
of America et al. by John S. Williams, Jennifer B. Dickey, Amy Chai, and
Kevin Carroll; for Lawyers for Civil Justice by Jonathan M. Redgrave
and Gareth T. Evans; for Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group by Jonathan
C. Bond, Saul Mezei, Lucas C. Townsend, and Vladimir J. Semendyai;
and for the Washington Legal Foundation by John M. Masslon II and
Cory L. Andrews.
Briefs of amici curiae were fled for the Association of Professional
Responsibility Lawyers by Arden J. Olson, William F. Gary, Sharon A.
Rudnick, and W. William Hodes; for the Atlantic Legal Foundation by
Lawrence S. Ebner, Ana Tagvoryan, and Arash Beral; for DRI Center
Page Proof Pending Publication

16 IN
RE GRAND JURY
Per Curiam
for Law and Public Policy by E. Todd Presnell; for Federation of De-
fense & Corporate Counsel by Mary-Christine Sungaila; and for the New
York Intellectual Property Law Association by Irena Royzman, Robert J.
Rando, Robert M. Isackson, and Mark A. Chapman.
Page Proof Pending Publication

Page Proof Pending Publication
Reporter’s Note
The attached opinion has been revised to refect the usual publication
and citation style of the United States Reports. The revised pagination
makes available the offcial United States Reports citation in advance of
publication. The syllabus has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions
for the convenience of the reader and constitutes no part of the opinion of
the Court. A list of counsel who argued or fled briefs in this case, and
who were members of the bar of this Court at the time this case was
argued, has been inserted following the syllabus. Other revisions may
include adjustments to formatting, captions, citation form, and any errant
punctuation. The following additional edits were made:
None