State v. Moore

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Antonio Lopez
Moore, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

 G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-172

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 12,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Antonio
Lopez Moore pled guilty to possession
with intent to distribute crack cocaine and possession with intent to
distribute crack cocaine within proximity of a school.  The trial judge sentenced him to concurrent terms of
imprisonment of fifteen years on each charge, and revoked his probation from a
prior offense.  Moore contends the trial judge erred in imposing a sentence
that exceeded the sentencing range in Moore’s plea agreement.  Moore’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating she reviewed the record and
concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Moore did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Moore’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF,
KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.