State v. Vaughn

CourtListener 10156191Scctapp12 mar 2008

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Angela Vaughn, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

 Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-167

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 12,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Michael W. Barcroft, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Angela Vaughn appeals her convictions and sentences
for murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime. 
On appeal, Vaughn maintains the trial court erred in admitting testimony of an
alleged threat to the victim, allowing hearsay testimony from the victim’s
co-workers, and failing to grant a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Vaughn’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., and PIEPER, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.