State v. Hayes

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Franklin Hayes, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-451

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 7,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director of Legal Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Franklin
Hayes appeals the revocation of his suspended sentence, arguing the trial court
erred in revoking four years of his suspended sentence when the State
recommended only a one-year revocation.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Hayes’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.