State v. McCray

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nacole McCray, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

Honorable George C. James, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-449

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 7,
2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans,
Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Nacole McCray appeals the
revocation of her probation.  McCray contends the probation judge erred in
revoking her probation without the benefit of a preliminary hearing.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON, A.J., and
GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.