State v. Brown

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jerome Bernard Brown, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Judge Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-468

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 8, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina
Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, Legal Counsel, South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jerome
Bernard Brown appeals the revocation of his probation.  Brown argues the
probation judge erred in revoking his probation without making the requisite
inquiry into the reasons he failed to pay supervision fees, restitution, and fines.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief,
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON, A.J., and
GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.