State v. Singleton

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Richard
Singleton, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-467

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 8,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Richard Singleton was convicted of one count of
possession of crack cocaine and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. 
Singleton appeals his conviction, arguing the circuit court erred in sentencing
him under a law that was no longer in effect.  Singleton’s counsel attached to
the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating she had reviewed the record and
concluded this appeal lacked merit.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Singleton’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON,
A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.