State v. Keith Sharpe

CourtListener 10156054Scctapp3 dic 2009

Testo completo

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keith Sharpe, Appellant.

Appeal From Bamberg County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.   2009-UP-581

Submitted November 2, 2009 –Filed December
3, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

 Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith Sharpe appeals his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute
cocaine and criminal domestic violence (third offense), arguing the plea judge
erred in accepting his plea without advising him of his right to confront his
accusers.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON,
A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.