CourtListener 10156034•State v. Thonal Edwards
Testo completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Thonal Edwards, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-595
Submitted December 1,2009 Filed December
15, 2009
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth Franklin-Best,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Thonal Edwards appeals his convictions
for two counts of armed robbery. On
appeal, he argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed
verdict. We affirm.
Substantial
circumstantial evidence proves Edwards participated in the armed robbery under
an accomplice liability theory: Edwards' accomplice stated he robbed the two
victims, and Edwards admitted he was present for both robberies and directly
participated in the first robbery by approaching victim one and warning him to
not move. Additionally, victim one identified Edwards as one of the people who
robbed him and police also discovered a magazine clip in Edwards' possession
matching the handgun used by Edwards' accomplice during the robbery.
Accordingly, the trial court correctly denied Edwards' motion for directed
verdict. See State v. Weston, 367 S.C. 279, 292-93, 625 S.E.2d
641, 648 (2006) ("If there is any direct evidence or any substantial
circumstantial evidence reasonably tending to prove the guilt of the accused,
the appellate court must find the case was properly submitted to the jury.").
AFFIRMED.[1]
HUFF,
GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.