State v. Greg Wall

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Greg Wall, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-518

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 19, 2009

Affirmed

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Greg
Wall appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the trial court lacked
subject matter jurisdiction to revoke his probation.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
following authority: S.C. Code Ann. §§
24-21-300, -450 (2007) (providing a probation revocation warrant or a citation
and affidavit give the court jurisdiction at any hearing on the violation).

Affirmed.

Hearn,
C.J., Huff, and Geathers,
J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.