State v. Tyrone Ervin

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tyrone Lee
Ervin, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-560

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 23, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tyrone
Lee Ervin appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the decision to
revoke his probation was without evidentiary support.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., Huff, and Geathers, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.