State v. Carroll

CourtListener 10155949Scctapp1 ott 2009

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Leon Carroll, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenwood County

Robert Frank Addy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-440

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
October 1, 2009  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Michael
Leon Carroll appeals his guilty plea for conspiracy and his pleas pursuant to North
Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), for two counts of distribution of
crack cocaine.  Carroll argues the plea court erred by advising him that he had
the right to appeal.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Short, Williams,
and Geathers, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.