State v. Weaver

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timeshia
Weaver, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-467

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
12, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Timeshia
Weaver appeals the revocation of her
probation, arguing the circuit court erred: (1) in revoking probation based on
the non-judicially imposed condition that she must attend and complete
substance abuse counseling; and (2) in failing to make a finding her probation
violations were willful.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.          

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.