State v. Rollinson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Steve A. Rollinson, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-471

Submitted October 1,2009 – Filed October
13, 2009  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Steve A. Rollinson appeals his conviction
for assault and battery with the intent to kill.  His counsel argues the trial
court erred by failing to order a competency evaluation. Additionally, Rollinson
filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

Huff, Thomas, and Pieper, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.