CourtListener 10155813•State v. McCall
Testo completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.,
Thomas McCall
Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
Michael Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-273
Submitted May 1, 2009 Filed June 2, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Thomas
McCall, Jr., appeals his guilty pleas and sentences for possession of cocaine
base, assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, and first-degree
criminal sexual conduct, arguing the plea court failed to advise him of the
constitutional rights he would be waiving by pleading guilty. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.