State v. Fleming

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ralph Kentil
Fleming, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-298

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed June 8, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia,  for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ralph
Kentil Fleming appeals his guilty plea and sentence for accessory after the
fact, arguing the plea court erred in refusing to consider, during sentencing,
his eventual cooperation in testifying for the State.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.