State v. Meetze

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Heidi N. Meetze, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-375

Submitted June 12, 2009 – Filed June 29,
2009  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Heidi
Meetze appeals her guilty plea and sentence, arguing her sentence is
unconstitutionally disproportionate to the committed offense.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Meetze’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.   

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.