State v. Edwards

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Corey Jamar
Edwards, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Michelle J. Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-Up-141

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 11,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Corey Jamar
Edwards appeals his guilty plea and sentence, arguing his guilty plea failed to
comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1982).  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HUFF,
WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.