State v. Griffin

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Fred Griffin, Appellant.

Appeal from York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-156

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 30,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Fred Griffin appeals his probation
revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation for failing
to pay restitution, failure to report, and absconding supervision without
making a finding that the failure to pay restitution was willful.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief,
and Griffin’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
PIEPER and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.