State v. Wlison

CourtListener 10155545Scctapp10 feb 2009

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

John E. Wilson,
Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-071

Submitted February 2, 2009 – Filed
February 10, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  John
E. Wilson, Jr. appeals his convictions for armed robbery and possession of a
weapon during the commission of a violent crime, and consecutive sentences of
thirty and five years' imprisonment, respectively.  Wilson's counsel argues the
State's closing argument denied Wilson the right to a fair trial.  Wilson
asserts the trial court erred in admitting the photo line-up into evidence,
failing to evaluate Wilson to determine if he was competent to stand trial, and
failing to ask Wilson if he needed counsel to be appointed before selecting a
jury.  After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.