State v. Jackson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent

v.

Charles Jackson, Appellant

Appeal from Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-012

Submitted January 2, 2009 – Filed January 8, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney
General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Charles
Jackson appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree burglary
(violent).  He argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for a
directed verdict where there was insufficient evidence of guilt.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Jackson’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Huff, Thomas, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.