CourtListener 10155444•State v. Redden
Testo completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Danny Redden, Appellant.
Appeal From Cherokee County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-656
Submitted December 1, 2008 Filed
December 4, 2008
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Danny Redden
was convicted of second degree burglary and sentenced to fifteen years
imprisonment, suspended on the service of six years, and three years
probation. On appeal, Redden argues the trial court erred by failing to direct
a verdict in his favor because the State failed to present evidence he entered the
premises without consent. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Evans v. Wabash Life Ins. Co., 247 S.C. 464, 466, 148 S.E.2d 153, 153 (1966) (finding
where a defendant presents evidence after moving for a directed verdict, the
motion must be renewed to preserve any error for appeal); State v.
Carlson, 363 S.C. 586, 608, 611 S.E.2d 283, 294 (Ct. App. 2005) (finding
appellant has the burden to provide a sufficient record for review or appeal).
AFFIRMED.
HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.