State v. Hayes

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Harlan Hayes, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-663

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 8, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Harlan
Hayes appeals his convictions and sentences for armed robbery and possession of
a firearm during the commission of a violent crime.  Hayes argues the trial
court erred by admitting hearsay into evidence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Hayes’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.   

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.