State v. Doll

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Vincent
Doll, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-611

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, State Grand Jury Chief Jennifer D. Evans, Assistant
Attorney General Susan O. Porter, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert
Vincent Doll, Jr. appeals from trafficking
in methamphetamine, conspiracy to trafficking in methamphetamine, and
possession of methamphetamine, for which he received concurrent sentences of
twenty-five years, twenty-five years, and ten years in prison, respectively.  Doll
argues the trial court erred in admitting the prior consistent statement of a
State’s witness from an audiotape made during a sting operation.  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.