CourtListener 10155364•State v. Earley
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Thomas Wayne
Earley, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-626
Submitted November 3, 2008 Filed
November 12, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of
Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Thomas Wayne Earley appeals
his ninety-day sentence for pointing and presenting a firearm. Earley argues
the trial judge erred in failing to instruct the jury to disregard improper
character evidence. After a thorough
review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.