State v. Frady

CourtListener 10155363Scctapp12 nov 2008

Testo completo

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Randolph
Frady, Appellant.

Appeal From Oconee County

 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-634

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 12, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor
Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Frady
appeals his convictions for grand
larceny, first- degree burglary, arson, possession of a weapon during the
commission of a violent crime, and two counts of murder, arguing the trial
court erred by precluding Frady from introducing evidence of third party guilt. After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Frady’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.