State v. Lathan

CourtListener 10155330Scctapp9 ott 2008

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Lathan, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County

 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-549

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October 9,
200

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia;  and Solicitor I. McDuffie  Stone, III, of Beaufort; for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  A
jury found Michael Lathan guilty of armed robbery.  Lathan argues the trial court erred in admitting a statement
made to police into evidence.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Lathan’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, WILLIAMS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.