CourtListener 10155274•State v. Drake
Testo completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Hobart Parker Drake, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-508
Submitted September 2, 2008 Filed
September 5, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Attorney General William Edgar
Salter, III, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Hobart Parker Drake, Jr. appeals his convictions
for car jacking, armed robbery, and murder. On
appeal, Drake contends the trial court erred in admitting a knife into
evidence. After a thorough
review of the record, counsels brief, and Drakes pro se brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.