State v. Singletary

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tyrone
Singletary, Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

 Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-506

Submitted September 2, 2008 – Filed
September 5, 2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia, and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Tyrone Singletary appeals his convictions for rioting, taking a hostage, assaulting a
correctional officer, carrying a weapon, and inciting a riot.  Singletary’s counsel claims the trial
court erred in admitting a video
depiction of the prison dormitory because it was highly inflammatory and its
probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial value.  Singletary also filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
Singletary’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Singletary’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,

concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.