In the Interest of Justin G.

CourtListener 10155189Scctapp18 ago 2008

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest
of Justin G., a minor under the age of seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Laurens County

Billy A. Tunstall, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-492

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August
18, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Justin G., a minor, appeals his guilty
pleas to second-degree burglary and simple assault and battery.  Justin argues
that his guilty pleas failed to comply with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S.
238 (1969).  After a thorough
review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Justin’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.