CourtListener 10155187•State v. Williams
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth Bernard
Williams, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-493
Submitted August 1, 2008 Filed August
18, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Kenneth
Bernard Williams appeals his guilty pleas to two counts of grand larceny; two
counts of third degree burglary, second offense; receiving stolen goods; and
resisting arrest. Williams argues the trial court erred by accepting his guilty
plea because his plea was not knowingly and intelligently made. After a thorough
review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Williams appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
KONDUROS,
J., CURETON, and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.