State v. Binion

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Paul Raymon
Binion, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

 Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-360

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 10,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
of Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E.
Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Paul
Raymon Binion appeals his guilty plea and sentence for forgery, stealing bonds,
financial identity fraud, and bank fraud. Binion argues his guilty plea failed
to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 S.C.
238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we dismiss[1] Binion’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

HEARN.
C.J., CURETON and GOOLDBY, A.J.J. concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.