CourtListener 10155112•State v. Korens
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Cedric O’Neal
Korens, Appellant.
Appeal From Laurens County
Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-370
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 11,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy
Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans,
Jr., Legal Counsel, and J. Benjamin Aplin, Legal Counsel, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Cedric Korens appeals the revocation of his probation. Korens
argues the circuit court was unfair in its probation revocation because the
circuit court was informed Korens medical condition caused his drug use. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Korens appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.