CourtListener 10155089•State v. Walling
Testo completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Laurie Walling, Appellant.
Appeal From Orangeburg County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-404
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 17, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Laurie
Walling appeals his guilty plea for armed robbery and sentence of twenty-two
years. He argues his guilty plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth
in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After
a thorough review of the record and counsels brief, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be
relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.