State v. Beeks

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Vanessa Beeks, Appellant.

Appeal from Greenville County

 D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-232

Submitted April 1, 2008 – Filed April 15,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney, Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina Commission
on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Vanessa Beeks appeals her guilty
plea for grand larceny, armed robbery,
and assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.  Beeks
claims that her guilty plea did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  Specifically, she claims the taking of
her plea in a group setting rendered her plea involuntary as she could have
been influenced by the actions of the other defendants.    After a thorough review of the record
and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss her appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and PIEPER, J., and GOOLSBY, A.J.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.