State v. Mattress

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tyhia Mattress, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

 J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-118

Submitted February 1, 2008 – Filed
February 13, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tyhia
Mattress appeals her conditions of probation, arguing the trial court erred by imposing an additional probation
condition requiring her to attend anger management classes.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Mattress’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.