State v. Washington

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Washington, Appellant.

Appeal from Richland County

Reginald I. Lloyd,
Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-012

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 9, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,  for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy
Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Kenneth Washington appeals the revocation of his
probation.  Washington contends the circuit court committed an abuse of
discretion in revoking his probation without a showing of a willful and
intentional violation.  After a thorough
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Washington’s pro se response
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Washington’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be
relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]

ANDERSON,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.