CourtListener 10154773•State v. Williams
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Tony Williams, Appellant.
__________
Appeal From Kershaw County
G. Thomas Cooper Jr., Circuit Court Judge
__________
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-343
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012
__________
APPEAL DISMISSED
__________
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tony Williams appeals his sentence, arguing the
circuit court erred in imposing a sentence that differed from the sentence
recommended by the State when the victim agreed to the State's
recommended sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.