State v. Jordan

CourtListener 10154678Scctapp16 mag 2012

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mack Jordan, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County

 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-309

Submitted April 2, 2012 – Filed May 16,
2012   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Mack Jordan, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor I. McDuffie Stone, III, of Beaufort,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Mack
Jordan appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary, arguing the trial
court erred in refusing to direct a verdict of acquittal because the State
failed to prove an unlawful entry.  Additionally, Jordan filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.