State v. Gibbons

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Nelson Gibbons, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-177 

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed March 14,
2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, and Daniel Nelson Gibbons, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Daniel
Nelson Gibbons appeals his convictions for first-degree harassment and
resisting arrest, arguing the trial court erred in allowing the State to play
the entire video of his arrest twice when only a portion was relevant to the
charge of resisting arrest.  After a thorough
review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

PIEPER,
KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.