Ravenell v. Meyer

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

A. Leon
Ravenell, Respondent,

v.

Nancy J. Meyer, Appellant.

Appeal From Berkeley County

 R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-590

Submitted December 1, 2011 – Filed
December 21, 2011   

AFFIRMED

Nancy J. Meyer, pro se, of Goose Creek.

George J. Morris, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  In this debt collection action, Nancy J.
Meyer appeals the trial court's order dismissing her counterclaim and granting
A. Leon Ravenell's motion for an involuntary nonsuit.  Meyer argues the trial
court erred in determining the statute of limitations on her counterclaim began
to run in August 2005 and in failing to set-off the judgment rendered against
her according to her partnership agreement terms.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and
the following authorities:  Rule 208(b)(1)(D), SCACR (requiring arguments in
appellate briefs to have citations to legal authority); First Sav. Bank v.
McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) (finding an argument
without supporting authority abandoned on appeal).    

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.