State v. Eslick

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

State of South
Carolina, Respondent,

v.

Martin Jeffrey Eslick, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Charles B. Simmons, Jr., Special Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-498

Submitted November 1, 2011 – Filed
November 9, 2011

AFFIRMED

J. Bradley Bennett, of Greenville, for Appellant.

David W. Holmes, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Martin Jeffrey Eslick appeals the circuit court's
order dismissing his criminal appeal from the municipal court.  He argues the
circuit court erred in dismissing his appeal because his notice of appeal
sufficiently set forth proper legal grounds for his appeal.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  City of
Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374 S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007)
("In criminal appeals from municipal court, the circuit court does not
conduct a de novo review. . . .  [An] appellate court reviews errors of law
only." (citations omitted)); Rogers v. State, 358 S.C. 266, 269,
594 S.E.2d 278, 279 (Ct. App. 2004) ("[Appellant] does not allege an error
of law, but instead argues that evidence in the record fails to support . . .
the municipal court's conclusion of his guilt . . . .").

AFFIRMED.

FEW,
C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.