CourtListener 10154210•State v. Woods
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Donniel Woods, Appellant.
Appeal From Clarendon County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-487
Submitted October 1, 2011 Filed October
31, 2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Donniel Woods appeals his convictions for first-degree
criminal sexual conduct, kidnapping, and strong armed robbery, arguing the
trial court erred in refusing to allow Woods to impeach the victim with a prior
bad act. After a thorough
review of the record, counsel's brief, and Woods's pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant
counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, PIEPER,
and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.