State v. Prioleau

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cory Prioleau, Appellant.

Appeal From Berkeley County

Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-422

Submitted September 1, 2011 – Filed
September 20, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Cory Prioleau appeals his convictions
and sentences for armed robbery and
first-degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in admitting hearsay
testimony concerning his co-defendants' statements to police.  After thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Prioleau's
appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.