CourtListener 10154171•SCDSS v. William A.
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department
of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
William A., Appellant.
In the interest of two minor children under
the age of 18.
Appeal From Berkeley County
Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-403
Submitted August 15, 2011 Filed August 25, 2011
AFFIRMED
Andrew S. Halio, of Charleston, for Appellant.
Paul C. White, of Moncks Corner, for Respondent.
Sean L. Keefer, of Charleston, for Guardian Ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: William A. appeals
the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor
children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law,
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family
court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.[1]
HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.