State v. Kelly

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Kelly, Appellant.

Appeal From Chesterfield County

George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-412  

Submitted August 15, 2011 – Filed August
29, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and William B. Rogers, Jr., of Bennettsville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Michael
Kelly appeals his convictions for incest, lewd act on a minor, and
second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor, arguing the circuit court
erred in denying his motion for a mistrial.  Additionally, Kelly filed a pro se
brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF and PIEPER, JJ., and CURETON,
A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.