State v. Waiters

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Gary Waiters, Appellant.

Appeal From Jasper County

Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-310  

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed June 20,
2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Issac McDuffie Stone, of Beaufort,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Gary Waiters appeals his conviction and
sentence for second-degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear prejudicial character
evidence concerning a police investigation of Waiters for a prior burglary.  After thoroughly reviewing the record and briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Waiters's
appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J.,
KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.